|
Back to School Homework vs. Activities
|
||
|
By Carmen Roman, M.D.
|
||
|
As
the new school year begins, general practitioners and pediatricians will
be busy with annual physical examinations for children. Parents will have,
among a host of others, questions about the pluses and minuses of extra
curricular activities for their children. “Is my child
over-scheduled with outside activities?” “Which ones will benefit my
child’s development (dance, sports, music, theater)?” “Which ones
are more detrimental?” “Will TV and computer games interfere with my
child’s schoolwork and progress?” “How much time should be devoted
to free play?” These are just a few of the questions parents are
concerned about. The answers are not
easy. Each parent must evaluate the situation according to their child’s
needs and abilities. Working together with the school is very important.
Talking with teachers will help in evaluating the time needed for
homework. Some children will need extra time to complete their homework
assignments. Others will finish quickly and still get good grades. All
these factors must be taken into account by parents in evaluating a
child’s needs. It has been well
documented that studying music and dance and participating in sports
increase the ability to concentrate and that children with this increased
ability do better in school.3 Emphasizing moderation
and treating each child as an individual with different needs and
abilities provide answers to figuring out a child’s scheduled
activities. When kids do well in school, their self-esteem improves,
giving them a sense of mastery, “I can do this.” Extra curricular
activities for a child, such as sports, music, theater, and dance also
will improve motor coordination, self-esteem, and socialization, which are
important for the growing child. Regarding time for free
play, parents need to be aware of what their kids are choosing for free
play. Many children spend hours watching TV, playing computer games,
exploring the Internet, and listening to music on an iPod or Walkman, all
of which tend to isolate them. It is more positive for kids to spend their
free time socializing with their peers. A new study looking at
TV viewing by younger children1 says that it all
depends on which TV programs a child watches. Watching educational
programs can be a positive learning experience for children. In the
September/October issue (2001) of Child Development, co-author
Aletha Huston, Ph.D., professor of child development at the University of
Texas, Austin, says, “Educational television can have a very positive
impact on young children.” For the study, researchers recruited 200 children in the Kansas City area who were from low-to-moderate-income families. About 40 percent of the children were African American, and the rest were Hispanic or Caucasian American. During the three-year study, researchers followed children from two to four years of age. They tested the children and visited their homes every year. The tests included reading, vocabulary, math, and school readiness. “Children who watched educational programming, particularly at ages two and three, performed better on tests of school-related skills than children who did not watch educational television,” says Huston. “Watching a lot of general audience programming was related to poor skills.” "Children who watched educational programming, particularly at ages two and three, perfromed better on tests of school-related skills than children who did not watch educational television." Aletha Huston, Ph.D. After controlling for
the family environment, which included parents’ education and family
income, Huston found that watching educational programs on television
might indeed translate to better skills. “What children watch
on television is the key,” says Daniel Anderson, Ph.D., professor of
psychology at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.1 “When
the television programs are designed to teach, children learn good things.
If they are not designed to teach, and especially if they include
violence, children learn things that end up being bad for their
behavior.” Anderson points out
that for children from low-to-moderate-income families, such educational
programming is filling in parts of their childhood experience that they
might not otherwise get. “These children very often don’t have other
educational resources available in their homes, such as age-appropriate
books, and parents often don’t understand the importance of reading to
their children and encouraging their children to read,” says Anderson. School-age children
spend a great deal of time on the Internet. The situation is the same as
with TV; parents need to emphasize moderation and control the sites to
which their children have access. Parents need to use filters and stay
aware of what their children are viewing. Watching too much television and
spending many hours on the Internet take away time children could use for
exercise and other school- and community-related activities. According to Niranjan
S. Karnik, M.D., Ph.D., 2 “Another area of
scholarship, for example, that has demonstrated substantial relationship
between mass media and experience is between body image and popular
culture. While the media may not cause eating disorders, the popular image
of beauty can be heavily influenced by the images around us, and
children’s ideas can be shaped in part by the media around them. (Brumberg,
2000; Steiner et al., 2003). Current research supports the idea that
children internalize socially sanctioned images of beauty and that these
exert an influence on the ways juveniles view their own bodies, often in
distorted ways.” Again, parents can play an important role here. Helping
their children develop realistic and healthy attitudes about their
appearance and guiding them into activities that will help keep them fit
can relieve some of the pressure children feel to conform to popular
notions of beauty. Dr. Karnik continues
that, “It is important to teach children how to critically evaluate the
various media influences around them and select what they find useful and
productive.” Dr. Roman is a psychiatrist and a child
psychiatrist in Menlo Park. References: 1.
Monogram. Soc Res. Child Development 2001; 66(1): I-VIII. 1-147. Ambulatory
Pediatrics 2001:1(5):244-2 2.
Niranjan S. Karnik, M.D., Ph.D. Mass media and youth culture. Handbook
of Mental Health Interventions in Children and Adolescents: an Integrated
Developmental Approach Hans Steiner, Editor. Jossey-Bass Books. 3.
Music’s Contribution to Academic Success. www.childrenmusicworkshop.com/advocacy/academicsuccess.html |